ifcLive is for owners and delivery teams who are no longer asking whether they need a digital twin. They need the systems they already chose to agree on identity, readiness, and handover evidence. It gives teams a place to review model lineage, asset naming, commissioning signals, and target-system readiness before those gaps become operations work.
ifcLive
Your systems are in place. They need to agree before handover.
ifcLive helps teams catch broken asset identity, readiness gaps, and missing handover evidence before operations inherits the building.
Multi-system owner stack
Fragile asset crosswalks
Evidence trapped in meetings
Late handover ambiguity
ifcLive helps teams catch broken asset identity, readiness gaps, and missing handover evidence before operations inherits the building.
Are these your pain points?
- Your digital twin stack already exists, but every system seems to name the building components differently.
- Tandem, iTwin, SkySpark, Esri, CMMS, BMS, spreadsheets, and source models do not agree on asset identity.
- COBie, point lists, commissioning records, and model exports drift apart before handover is complete.
- Nobody can answer lineage questions quickly when a model revision changes what downstream teams already reviewed.
- Point bindings and operating-system mappings are discussed in meetings, then defended later with screenshots.
- Target-platform setup gaps appear late, when the project needs proof instead of another cleanup cycle.
Request beta access
Good beta fit
- You operate a campus, portfolio, public facility, healthcare network, airport, utility, or major capital program.
- You already use serious AEC/O systems and need them to share trusted building information.
- You are preparing for commissioning, owner handover, target-platform setup, or a messy integration pilot.